hope4gc
04-02 08:08 AM
Gurus,
I have completed 4 years on H1B and I converted to L2 status and applied for EAD(feb'10) thru my Spouse's L1 Visa.
My GC is in process and not filed my I-485 yet.
Now my question is, as if i stay L2 for 1 year and if i convert it back to H1B, will my H1 term Start all over and will i get additional 6 year term? Please provide your feedback
Thanks
I have completed 4 years on H1B and I converted to L2 status and applied for EAD(feb'10) thru my Spouse's L1 Visa.
My GC is in process and not filed my I-485 yet.
Now my question is, as if i stay L2 for 1 year and if i convert it back to H1B, will my H1 term Start all over and will i get additional 6 year term? Please provide your feedback
Thanks
wallpaper Israeli Flag (Flag of Israel)
paystubissue
03-16 12:27 AM
Hi all,
Please help me with the following questions.
I am planning to apply for h1b transfer in the near future but with a paystub that is having salary lesser than the usual one. Is that advisable to do premium processing in this case?
I am looking for the premium processing option as I might have to travel outside USA before I could know about the result(approval or rejection) so I assumed that I can know the result through premium processing, travel without any problem and can get it stamped too.
Or is it fine to travel when I have applied for the transfer?I have my company A visa(which I got last year) stamped in my passport.
please let me know your thoughts
Regards
Please help me with the following questions.
I am planning to apply for h1b transfer in the near future but with a paystub that is having salary lesser than the usual one. Is that advisable to do premium processing in this case?
I am looking for the premium processing option as I might have to travel outside USA before I could know about the result(approval or rejection) so I assumed that I can know the result through premium processing, travel without any problem and can get it stamped too.
Or is it fine to travel when I have applied for the transfer?I have my company A visa(which I got last year) stamped in my passport.
please let me know your thoughts
Regards
gc_in_30_yrs
07-27 04:20 PM
Hi, I know this question is being asked by many people. I am sorry, but still confused. My situation is:
EB3 - Labor filed - Aug, 2004 - BackLogged - Philadelphia - 45 day letter - Replied
EB2 - Labor filed - Nov, 2005, Approved, I-140 filed - Mar 2006 - Approved.
Can I continue using EB3, once Labor Approved anbd I-140 Approved, can I use that PD to my EB2? The job description is definately different on EB3 and EB2. Still can I use the EB3 PD on to EB2?
Gurus, Please advise.
Thanks.
EB3 - Labor filed - Aug, 2004 - BackLogged - Philadelphia - 45 day letter - Replied
EB2 - Labor filed - Nov, 2005, Approved, I-140 filed - Mar 2006 - Approved.
Can I continue using EB3, once Labor Approved anbd I-140 Approved, can I use that PD to my EB2? The job description is definately different on EB3 and EB2. Still can I use the EB3 PD on to EB2?
Gurus, Please advise.
Thanks.
2011 The Official Flag Of Israel
Dakshini R. Sen
06-24 11:34 PM
Enter your employer's name and address in question number 15. The advice you have got from the IO is not correct. You will not be put into deportation the moment you lose your job. You have time to either transfer your H1 or file a petition for a change of status to another classification.
Dakshini R. Sen, P.C.
Law Offices of Dakshini R. Sen P.C. , Immigration Lawyer US. (http://www.dakshinisen.com)
212-242-1677
713-278-1677
Dakshini R. Sen, P.C.
Law Offices of Dakshini R. Sen P.C. , Immigration Lawyer US. (http://www.dakshinisen.com)
212-242-1677
713-278-1677
more...
priya777
07-18 01:04 PM
june 12th applicated date.. betweenthey are company checks so i cant track them
Blog Feeds
04-06 10:50 AM
Immigration Visa Attorney Blog Has Just Posted the Following:
The Barack Obama Administration recently announced that border guards at United States Ports of Entry (POE) will begin screening aliens arriving from certain countries based on specific information about threats to the USA. The immigration attorneys at Los Angeles' Fong & Chun immigration law firm are advocates for national security balanced against sensible protections for civil rights. We hope this change will reduce the number of unwarranted, unreasonable, and (usually) unfriendly challenges to certain arriving visitors.
Since the New York terrorist attack in September 2001, the USA has maintained a list of approximately fourteen countries (the so-called "group of fourteen") which are considered to encourage state-sponsored terrorism, or which are believed to provide assistance to terrorists. The US would not even officially name the specific countries, or confirm the exact number of countries, on the list. All citizens of one of these countries -- of any gender, any age, any social class, any educational level, for any reason -- would be subjected to additional interrogation by US Border Guards.
The newly-announced change sets up a system which uses intelligence information and threat assessment -- about specific persons, specific targets, and specific descriptions, to identify passengers who might have a link to terrorism. Quite properly, those persons would be subjected to additional scrutiny. Others who do not meet the more reasoned threat profiles would be allowed to enter the USA in the way of other visitors.
For example: most people in the know would say that the Islamic Republic of Iran was part of the group of fourteen. All citizens from Iran -- absolutely all -- would be pulled aside and interrogated at POEs. Under the new system, if the US has specific information about a 26-year old male Iranian student, or an Iranian woman with a certain name, or even someone with a partial passport number, then persons meeting those descriptions will be pulled aside. This allows border guards to focus their efforts on persons about whom the USA has specific threat-related information. --jcf
More... (http://www.immigrationvisaattorneyblog.com/2010/04/border-guards-will-finally-use.html)
The Barack Obama Administration recently announced that border guards at United States Ports of Entry (POE) will begin screening aliens arriving from certain countries based on specific information about threats to the USA. The immigration attorneys at Los Angeles' Fong & Chun immigration law firm are advocates for national security balanced against sensible protections for civil rights. We hope this change will reduce the number of unwarranted, unreasonable, and (usually) unfriendly challenges to certain arriving visitors.
Since the New York terrorist attack in September 2001, the USA has maintained a list of approximately fourteen countries (the so-called "group of fourteen") which are considered to encourage state-sponsored terrorism, or which are believed to provide assistance to terrorists. The US would not even officially name the specific countries, or confirm the exact number of countries, on the list. All citizens of one of these countries -- of any gender, any age, any social class, any educational level, for any reason -- would be subjected to additional interrogation by US Border Guards.
The newly-announced change sets up a system which uses intelligence information and threat assessment -- about specific persons, specific targets, and specific descriptions, to identify passengers who might have a link to terrorism. Quite properly, those persons would be subjected to additional scrutiny. Others who do not meet the more reasoned threat profiles would be allowed to enter the USA in the way of other visitors.
For example: most people in the know would say that the Islamic Republic of Iran was part of the group of fourteen. All citizens from Iran -- absolutely all -- would be pulled aside and interrogated at POEs. Under the new system, if the US has specific information about a 26-year old male Iranian student, or an Iranian woman with a certain name, or even someone with a partial passport number, then persons meeting those descriptions will be pulled aside. This allows border guards to focus their efforts on persons about whom the USA has specific threat-related information. --jcf
More... (http://www.immigrationvisaattorneyblog.com/2010/04/border-guards-will-finally-use.html)
more...
Rajwaitingon140
09-21 06:26 PM
Dec 21 2007 - EB2 Regular
How come you have DEC'21'2007 I-140 date? date is NOT yer arrived or it is typo mistake?
Thanks
RajWaitingon140
EB-3, I-140 still in process since Dec'2006 at NSC center.
How come you have DEC'21'2007 I-140 date? date is NOT yer arrived or it is typo mistake?
Thanks
RajWaitingon140
EB-3, I-140 still in process since Dec'2006 at NSC center.
2010 Israel flag. Israel flag
factoryman
06-30 02:43 PM
250 words in the body of the thread. It can't be one liners.
That will explain why and what A thread is for. Otherwise, members will be scatching their heads and will show no further interest.
Guys,
since many of us are experts in analyzing data, leets start coming up with qualifiable impacts that can help people respond quickly to ALIF's potential lawsuit
That will explain why and what A thread is for. Otherwise, members will be scatching their heads and will show no further interest.
Guys,
since many of us are experts in analyzing data, leets start coming up with qualifiable impacts that can help people respond quickly to ALIF's potential lawsuit
more...
raju6855
01-19 05:11 PM
This has been big bummer. had to cancel the flight and now my wife is thinking about dropping out of semester.
hair IL04 1639 Flag of Israel flies
kzinjuwadia
05-13 11:53 PM
It does. MS = BS + 5yrs experience per the general guideline principles followed by CIS/companies. My EB2 was applied when I had around 1yrs exp after MS. Imp thing is that the job for which your LC is being filed should have EB2 requirement. Make sure of that. Otherwise, even if a PhD candidate is employed for a layman job, it's doesn't warrant EB1. the driving factor is the job's requirement.
more...
asdfred
06-08 11:18 PM
I do not think today is the day and tomorrow does not look any better..for Comprehensive Reform or Employment based reform..All we can do today here is just show some support to each other at IV
hot 2011 Crossed-Flag-Pins Israel
Rune
February 3rd, 2005, 01:55 AM
Nice edit Anders. And your version seem to be more in line with the rule of thirds too?
more...
house Israel#39;s flag Photo: Oren
jonty_11
05-14 11:08 AM
Guys no response....Is immigration voice really cold now?
tattoo Photo from:Flag of Israel
joolie1
02-08 09:38 AM
so my Perm Res Card = a Green Card?
What a relief!
(Can you tell I am wading through the murky immigration waters without a lawyer at the helm?)
What a relief!
(Can you tell I am wading through the murky immigration waters without a lawyer at the helm?)
more...
pictures Israel Flag
waitingimmigrant
11-09 11:05 PM
hi friends,
some time ago i contact my senator through this site
http://www.opencongress.org/bill/111-s1085/show
and wrote to him about plight of workers in limbo for years
if not decades ... following is response i recieved... request
all those stuck in GC limbo to contact their senators...
-----------------------------------------------------------------------------
U.S. immigration policy is based on four underlying principles: reunification of families, admissions of immigrants with needed skills, protection of refugees, and diversity of admission by country of origin. The Immigration and Nationality Act specifies priorities for permanent immigration using a complex set of numerical limits and preference categories. Immediate relatives, defined as spouses of citizens, children (under 21 years of age and unmarried) of citizens, and parents of citizens 21 years of age or older, have been given priority in the immigration process.
Senator Robert Menendez (D-NJ) introduced S.1085 on May 20, 2009. This legislation seeks to reduce current immigration backlogs by classifying lawful permanent resident (LPR) spouses and children as "immediate relatives." Currently, spouses and children of LPRs must obtain visas through the Family Second Preference category. This can lead to a waiting period of several years. Among other things, this bill would allow unused and unclaimed visas from 1992-2007 to be placed back in the pool of current available visas for families, and would establish a �roll over� system for unused and unclaimed visas in the future. This bill has been referred to the Senate Committee on the Judiciary, where it awaits further review.
I will continue to work with my colleagues in the Senate to craft effective solutions to address our nation�s immigration problems. I will keep your thoughts in mind should S.1085, or any similar legislation, come before me in the full Senate.
some time ago i contact my senator through this site
http://www.opencongress.org/bill/111-s1085/show
and wrote to him about plight of workers in limbo for years
if not decades ... following is response i recieved... request
all those stuck in GC limbo to contact their senators...
-----------------------------------------------------------------------------
U.S. immigration policy is based on four underlying principles: reunification of families, admissions of immigrants with needed skills, protection of refugees, and diversity of admission by country of origin. The Immigration and Nationality Act specifies priorities for permanent immigration using a complex set of numerical limits and preference categories. Immediate relatives, defined as spouses of citizens, children (under 21 years of age and unmarried) of citizens, and parents of citizens 21 years of age or older, have been given priority in the immigration process.
Senator Robert Menendez (D-NJ) introduced S.1085 on May 20, 2009. This legislation seeks to reduce current immigration backlogs by classifying lawful permanent resident (LPR) spouses and children as "immediate relatives." Currently, spouses and children of LPRs must obtain visas through the Family Second Preference category. This can lead to a waiting period of several years. Among other things, this bill would allow unused and unclaimed visas from 1992-2007 to be placed back in the pool of current available visas for families, and would establish a �roll over� system for unused and unclaimed visas in the future. This bill has been referred to the Senate Committee on the Judiciary, where it awaits further review.
I will continue to work with my colleagues in the Senate to craft effective solutions to address our nation�s immigration problems. I will keep your thoughts in mind should S.1085, or any similar legislation, come before me in the full Senate.
dresses Israel Ceremonial Flags
humsuplou
11-17 11:46 AM
Thank you all for the advice and inputs!!
more...
makeup Israel Flag
eb2waiter
05-04 09:54 PM
the date
:rolleyes:(not number of days to president signs)
thanks
:rolleyes:(not number of days to president signs)
thanks
girlfriend Israel Flag
Dirge
03-15 04:27 PM
i do not see a picture.
http://fc93.deviantart.com/fs44/f/2009/059/8/1/Self_portrait_desktop_by_MelonCat.png
:).
in other news I'm thinking of doing another entry.
http://fc93.deviantart.com/fs44/f/2009/059/8/1/Self_portrait_desktop_by_MelonCat.png
:).
in other news I'm thinking of doing another entry.
hairstyles b3ta.com challenge: new flags
drak70
03-06 01:36 PM
I thought FNU meant First name Unknown
used onlu when you have a single name
Lastly you can alsways go toa court and officialy add your surname to hers legally
used onlu when you have a single name
Lastly you can alsways go toa court and officialy add your surname to hers legally
iman.karta
12-27 04:23 PM
Hi Starscream,
I am currently in the same situation like you are (and hopefully were?); they are a mistake in filling the ETA9089.
The error is in such a way that from USCIS point of view, I worked during the gap of period between my OPT and H1-B transition.
So I guess I just want to know how your case is resolved? That way I have an idea what will happen to mine. ;(
Thanks for the info!
I am currently in the same situation like you are (and hopefully were?); they are a mistake in filling the ETA9089.
The error is in such a way that from USCIS point of view, I worked during the gap of period between my OPT and H1-B transition.
So I guess I just want to know how your case is resolved? That way I have an idea what will happen to mine. ;(
Thanks for the info!
chna
06-30 11:46 AM
Hi Friends,
I am a green card holder, becoming eligible for citizenship in April 2009. My fianc�e has been in the US for the past 2 plus years on F1. She completes her MS in December this year .We plan to visit our home country in August this year and get married. I thought this was a relatively uncomplicated case till I read in some forum recently that marriage to a permanent resident can be a barrier to being admitted to the U.S. in F-1 status. This is because such a marriage obliterates the "non-immigrant" intent required for F-1 entrants. This could very easily jeopardize her plan to re-enter in F-1 status.
Any thoughts or advice on this? Appreciate all the help.
Thanks a lot.
I am a green card holder, becoming eligible for citizenship in April 2009. My fianc�e has been in the US for the past 2 plus years on F1. She completes her MS in December this year .We plan to visit our home country in August this year and get married. I thought this was a relatively uncomplicated case till I read in some forum recently that marriage to a permanent resident can be a barrier to being admitted to the U.S. in F-1 status. This is because such a marriage obliterates the "non-immigrant" intent required for F-1 entrants. This could very easily jeopardize her plan to re-enter in F-1 status.
Any thoughts or advice on this? Appreciate all the help.
Thanks a lot.
