asanghi
06-22 02:18 PM
If both I-94s belong to the same person then I think it is normal.
I entered country last time in 2005. After that I have my H1 renewed twice both times I-94 number stayed the same. Same also goes for my wife. The renewed I-94 always carries the same number as the one you got while entering the country.
I entered country last time in 2005. After that I have my H1 renewed twice both times I-94 number stayed the same. Same also goes for my wife. The renewed I-94 always carries the same number as the one you got while entering the country.
wallpaper 3D World Wallpapers.
diptam
07-17 10:15 PM
Once your GC gets approved , thenit may be difficult for your wife to file
Hi, I am in same boat as you. I tried to find infomation & reality is 485 for future spouse can be filed only if the PD becomes current.
Hi, I am in same boat as you. I tried to find infomation & reality is 485 for future spouse can be filed only if the PD becomes current.
ysnraju
12-17 07:30 PM
My PD also wrong. for almost last 2 months I am trying DOL through My attorney That includes so far 8 fax letters requesting the same but no results sofar
2011 World map, 3D globe,
wandmaker
05-12 01:00 PM
I understand that a H1B visa is the expense to the employer and is not a taxable benefit to the employee. If a company wishes to pay for the green card for the employee, granting them permanent residence in the U.S., is this a taxable benefit to the employee? Should it be added to their W-2? If yes, where is the IRS documentation on this? I can�t find it. Thanks.
If the company pays for GC expenses directly, then it is an expense to the company, and it will not be reported on W2 as it is not a taxable benefit. However, if you are being reimbursed for GC expenses, *some* companies report this in paycheck as non-taxable income, again you will not be paying taxes to IRS on this. It is just a record keeping.
If the company pays for GC expenses directly, then it is an expense to the company, and it will not be reported on W2 as it is not a taxable benefit. However, if you are being reimbursed for GC expenses, *some* companies report this in paycheck as non-taxable income, again you will not be paying taxes to IRS on this. It is just a record keeping.
more...
kirupa
05-16 02:28 PM
You should work on the colors a bit more! I think there are too many gradient colors in that stamp :)
Munna Bhai
07-06 05:50 AM
Hi,
My mother is visiting us, how/from where to take Visitor Medical Insurance? Any input is greatly appreciated.
Thanks,
-M
My mother is visiting us, how/from where to take Visitor Medical Insurance? Any input is greatly appreciated.
Thanks,
-M
more...
niklshah
11-11 10:29 PM
i am trying to renew my passport, do we need to fill the form online and than submit it online or we have to print, instructions are confusing..pls help out
2010 stock vector : World map, 3D globe series
crazyghoda
06-16 07:22 PM
So step children get the same benefits as dependants. Good to know. I guess if it wasnt so, someone would have raised some issue about it by now. Atleast there would have been a bill in congress.
After marriage he will be your step-son and is eligible for L2 dependent visa.
After marriage he will be your step-son and is eligible for L2 dependent visa.
more...
krishna_brc
02-02 04:49 PM
I have received my green card 5 months ago and still working for the same GC filing employer(a consulting company). My wife had an RFE on her GC, since she could not take MMR at 2007 fiasco time. We have recently replied with the evidence. Now my project is getting over at the client site in next couple of weeks. I am sure that I can lose my job at consulting company also.
My question is, what happens to wife's GC? What if there is another RFE and how can I reply it?
Please let me know my options.
BTW - change your user id to GC_EB2_Received
!!!!! Just Kidding.
My question is, what happens to wife's GC? What if there is another RFE and how can I reply it?
Please let me know my options.
BTW - change your user id to GC_EB2_Received
!!!!! Just Kidding.
hair 3D World Wallpapers.
smuggymba
12-18 08:31 AM
Cap on skilled immigration unlawful: UK court - World News - IBNLive (http://ibnlive.in.com/news/cap-on-skilled-immigration-unlawful-uk-court/137822-2.html?from=tn)
London: A temporary cap on the number of skilled workers from India and other countries outside the European Union was introduced in June 'unlawfully', the High Court ruled on Friday.
Home Secretary Theresa May had introduced the cap as an interim measure before a permanent cap to be in place from April 2011. It was challenged on the ground that ministers had 'sidestepped' parliamentary scrutiny before announcing the
temporary cap.
The legal challenge to the cap of 24,100 until April 2011 was brought by the Joint Council for the Welfare of Immigrants (JCWI) and English Community Care Association, and was upheld by judges on Friday.
The Home Office said this did not imperil its flagship immigration policy but the opposition Labour said the police it was in "chaos" after the court ruling.
The ruling has nullified the current temporary cap, meaning it is no longer in force.
The cap was one of the first measures of the coalition government that promised to bring down immigrations from hundreds of thousands every year to 'tens of thousands.
In today's ruling, Lord Justice Sullivan and Justice Burton concluded that the home secretary had not gone through the proper parliamentary procedures before implementing the cap, which took effect without a vote in Parliament.
The judges said: "The secretary of state made no secret of her intentions. There can be no doubt that she was attempting to side-step provisions for Parliamentary scrutiny set up under provisions of the 1971 Immigration Act and her attempt was for that reason unlawful." As a result, it said no lawful limits were now in place for Tier One and Tier Two applicants from abroad. The Home Office said it was still "firmly committed" to reducing levels of net migration. "I am disappointed with today's verdict," Immigration minister Damian Green said, adding: "We will do all in our power to continue to prevent a rush of applications before our more permanent measures are in place".
London: A temporary cap on the number of skilled workers from India and other countries outside the European Union was introduced in June 'unlawfully', the High Court ruled on Friday.
Home Secretary Theresa May had introduced the cap as an interim measure before a permanent cap to be in place from April 2011. It was challenged on the ground that ministers had 'sidestepped' parliamentary scrutiny before announcing the
temporary cap.
The legal challenge to the cap of 24,100 until April 2011 was brought by the Joint Council for the Welfare of Immigrants (JCWI) and English Community Care Association, and was upheld by judges on Friday.
The Home Office said this did not imperil its flagship immigration policy but the opposition Labour said the police it was in "chaos" after the court ruling.
The ruling has nullified the current temporary cap, meaning it is no longer in force.
The cap was one of the first measures of the coalition government that promised to bring down immigrations from hundreds of thousands every year to 'tens of thousands.
In today's ruling, Lord Justice Sullivan and Justice Burton concluded that the home secretary had not gone through the proper parliamentary procedures before implementing the cap, which took effect without a vote in Parliament.
The judges said: "The secretary of state made no secret of her intentions. There can be no doubt that she was attempting to side-step provisions for Parliamentary scrutiny set up under provisions of the 1971 Immigration Act and her attempt was for that reason unlawful." As a result, it said no lawful limits were now in place for Tier One and Tier Two applicants from abroad. The Home Office said it was still "firmly committed" to reducing levels of net migration. "I am disappointed with today's verdict," Immigration minister Damian Green said, adding: "We will do all in our power to continue to prevent a rush of applications before our more permanent measures are in place".
more...
waiting_4_gc
08-25 01:15 PM
No need to file 2nd I-485.
Just update your existing I-485 with 2nd I-140 and claim earlier PD. You can claim PD with EB2.
Your lawyer should be able to do that.
_________________________
Not a legal advise.
Thanks for your response.
I forgot to mention this, client company got acquired by another company. And I have first company name on approved I-140 (EB2).
Do i have to file successor-in-interest before i update my existing i-485 with I-140 (EB2)?
Thanks
Just update your existing I-485 with 2nd I-140 and claim earlier PD. You can claim PD with EB2.
Your lawyer should be able to do that.
_________________________
Not a legal advise.
Thanks for your response.
I forgot to mention this, client company got acquired by another company. And I have first company name on approved I-140 (EB2).
Do i have to file successor-in-interest before i update my existing i-485 with I-140 (EB2)?
Thanks
hot 3D isolated gold soccer ball
apimvoice
07-17 05:25 PM
Hi,My I-140 was approved on 07/02/2008.I recieved an email update and online status also showing Approval notice sent.This monday my attroney send me a copy of Approval notice.
Receipt Date :01/07/2008
Notice Date :01/09/2008
Approval Date:07/02/2008
Center :TSC
Category :EB2.
PD :Dec'2006.
No concurrent filing.
Waiting to file I-485.
Thanks
Rajesh
Receipt Date :01/07/2008
Notice Date :01/09/2008
Approval Date:07/02/2008
Center :TSC
Category :EB2.
PD :Dec'2006.
No concurrent filing.
Waiting to file I-485.
Thanks
Rajesh
more...
house World Globe Map
seahawks
03-02 09:17 AM
only if termination is initiated by the employer, not employee. If you resign, the company is not required to provide you the one way ticket to your home country.
tattoo Free Download 3D World Map
donsimahajan
06-22 11:41 AM
Right, they're going to take one step forward, and two step backwards. Because the moment they take one step forward, they get flooded with applications they can't handle.
more...
pictures world map 3D Ravensburger
chanduv23
11-02 10:59 AM
I am in NYC. My wife's attorney Stephen Perlitsh, is just too busy to give us some career guidance and cancels our appointments in last moment. I have no problem paying a good fee if I can get a real good prefessional advice, it is very essential for us in this retrogressed scenerio.
R u specilising in Residencies and fellowships etcc?? I will PM u though.
Thanks
R u specilising in Residencies and fellowships etcc?? I will PM u though.
Thanks
dresses Save favorite maps with BMP,
MrWaitingGC
09-08 07:26 PM
As long as visa is stamped she can enter us on the last date of expiry of visa.
If you get your renewal approved when she is in India send her the approved letter original (courier it) so that she can show to the officers at port of entry and this new date will be entered in I94 expiry. If she dont show it then she will get I94 for only few day depending on officer and you will have to apply for extention again.
Check with attorney that I am correct :)
If you get your renewal approved when she is in India send her the approved letter original (courier it) so that she can show to the officers at port of entry and this new date will be entered in I94 expiry. If she dont show it then she will get I94 for only few day depending on officer and you will have to apply for extention again.
Check with attorney that I am correct :)
more...
makeup World map, 3D globe series
jkays94
06-21 06:46 PM
Thanks for reply
How can I find was it for misdemeanor or battery or felony?
I-485 part III would require you to answer 'yes' to the following question:
Have you ever, in or outside the United States:
been arrested, cited, charged, indicted, fined or imprisoned for breaking or violating any law or ordinance, excluding traffic violations?
Your best bet would be to conduct a background check in your state to see if it shows up on your record. You might want to consult a lawyer to see if this shows up in police or other records as well. Ironically I recently heard of a lawyer who recently advised someone to answer no to the question for a DWI since it was a 'traffic violation'. Note that if you answer yes you have the opportunity to explain on a separate piece of paper.
How can I find was it for misdemeanor or battery or felony?
I-485 part III would require you to answer 'yes' to the following question:
Have you ever, in or outside the United States:
been arrested, cited, charged, indicted, fined or imprisoned for breaking or violating any law or ordinance, excluding traffic violations?
Your best bet would be to conduct a background check in your state to see if it shows up on your record. You might want to consult a lawyer to see if this shows up in police or other records as well. Ironically I recently heard of a lawyer who recently advised someone to answer no to the question for a DWI since it was a 'traffic violation'. Note that if you answer yes you have the opportunity to explain on a separate piece of paper.
girlfriend world map globe 3d.
eb3bakra
10-12 02:27 PM
There wil be light at the end...
hairstyles help 3d world map
ras
04-12 07:27 PM
I don't remember the amount of fees submitted while filing I 485. However the filing was done after the July fiasco (Aug 2007). so whatever rates were applicable after Jul 2007 that must have been the fees that has been sent.
So in that scenario, is it just okay to send the AP application with out Fees?
How are you July Filers applying for AP? Are you sending in the check for the AP fees too?
So in that scenario, is it just okay to send the AP application with out Fees?
How are you July Filers applying for AP? Are you sending in the check for the AP fees too?
ras
09-05 09:12 PM
http://www.eenadu.net/story.asp?qry1=7&reccount=24
Washington Telugu assn website
http://www.gwtcs.net/
There is a new committe being elected for Greater Telugu Association of Washington. They will be of definite help to IV members during their rally on Sept 18. Can the IV representatives get in touch with these guys.
Some of the contact info
PRESIDENT(President)
Mahesh Gorle
703.793.0191
mgorle2002@yahoo.com
VICE PRESIDENT(organizational)
Trilok Kantheti
703.585.3565
trilok2000@yahoo.com
VICE PRESIDENT(Cultural)
Venugopal Reddy Janga
703.994.4175
mail2janga@yahoo.com
VICE PRESIDENT(Youth)
Aditya Modepalli
(408) 406 8057
aditya2439_2000@yahoo.co.uk
SECRETARY(SECRETARY)
Satya Surapaneni
satyasurap@hotmail.com
SECRETARY(Joint Secretary)
RamaKishore Chennupati
ramachennupati@yahoo.com
SECRETARY(CULTURAL)
Manga Anantatmula
manantatmula@gmail.com
BOARD OF DIRECTORS(BOARD OF DIRECTORS)
Sastry Yanamandra
301.279.9604
BOARD OF DIRECTORS(Board of Directors)
Satish Vemana
703.222.1111
satish@gwtcs.org
Washington Telugu assn website
http://www.gwtcs.net/
There is a new committe being elected for Greater Telugu Association of Washington. They will be of definite help to IV members during their rally on Sept 18. Can the IV representatives get in touch with these guys.
Some of the contact info
PRESIDENT(President)
Mahesh Gorle
703.793.0191
mgorle2002@yahoo.com
VICE PRESIDENT(organizational)
Trilok Kantheti
703.585.3565
trilok2000@yahoo.com
VICE PRESIDENT(Cultural)
Venugopal Reddy Janga
703.994.4175
mail2janga@yahoo.com
VICE PRESIDENT(Youth)
Aditya Modepalli
(408) 406 8057
aditya2439_2000@yahoo.co.uk
SECRETARY(SECRETARY)
Satya Surapaneni
satyasurap@hotmail.com
SECRETARY(Joint Secretary)
RamaKishore Chennupati
ramachennupati@yahoo.com
SECRETARY(CULTURAL)
Manga Anantatmula
manantatmula@gmail.com
BOARD OF DIRECTORS(BOARD OF DIRECTORS)
Sastry Yanamandra
301.279.9604
BOARD OF DIRECTORS(Board of Directors)
Satish Vemana
703.222.1111
satish@gwtcs.org
Counterproductive
10-30 12:36 PM
Otherwise its pretty good but I don't know what its for exactly so im going
assume its some sort of comunity thing. The silhouette of people seems to be pretty trendy right now (ipod, coke, etc). Without knowing what its for thats really all I can say.
assume its some sort of comunity thing. The silhouette of people seems to be pretty trendy right now (ipod, coke, etc). Without knowing what its for thats really all I can say.
ليست هناك تعليقات:
إرسال تعليق